In an interview with Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly commented on The Manhattan  Declaration (see 
http://ManhattanDeclaration.org/ ,  and repeated the biblical statement that 
"he who is without sin, let  him cast the first stone."   And while I believe that Bill  O'Reilly is a sincere believer, his response to the clergy who signed the  Manhattan Declaration embodies the error of much of the Christian world  today.      
   
 Bill O'Reilly's shortsightedness stems from his misunderstanding of the  difference between judgement, and discernment.   Christians are not only  obligated to discern the actions of their brothers and sisters, but a lack of  discernment has the power to totally undermine their standing as a believer and  follower in Jesus, and the core Gospel teachings.   The answer is found in the  statement of Paul not to judge the people outside the Church, and yet to have  nothing to do with them -- i.e., "But now I have written to you not  to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or  covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner -- not  even to eat with such a person.  For what have I to do with judging those also  who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? But those who are  outside God judges. Therefore 'put away from yourselves the evil  person'" (1 Cor 5:11-13 NKJ).   That the vast number of  Christians have failed to observe this commandment, is representative of the  very reason for the great struggle with the cultural immorality and depravity  that has undermined the Church.   
  
 One of the primary obligations of a Christian household is to  raise children who are able to discern good from evil -- choosing the good, and  having no part with the evil.   And clearly, Paul teaches to have nothing to do  with those who are 
"...sexually immoral, or covetous, or an  idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner -- not even to eat with  such a person."    What has been the impact on our children, of  ignoring this requirement?  
 Research gathered by the Southern Baptist Council on Family Life which  reported in 2002 "...that 88 percent of the children raised in evangelical homes leave  church at the age of 18, never to return." (see 
God's  Indictment Of The Church).   Why?   For largely convenience and complacency,  the vast majority of Christians fail to see the grave error in permitting not  only the government, but also left-leaning secular progressives to teach those  souls who were placed in the care and hands of Christians to raise in accord  with core Gospel principles.   Again, if we ask: What does Paul state about  having anything to do with unbelievers?   
"Therefore 'Come out from  among them and be separate, says the Lord. Do not touch what is unclean, and I  will receive you'" (2 Cor 6:17 NKJ).   Yet, we immerse our  children in the unclean and the immoral, in total disregard of Gospel teachings  and requirements.
   
 Like most Christians, Bill O'Reilly does not appear to have an enlightened  perspective on the vast differences between the commandment not to be  judgmental, and yet be able to discern good and evil.    When Jesus said that  
"he who is without sin, let him cast the first stone",  this was in response to those who wanted to stone the woman as punishment for  her sins.   And in confirmation of what Paul states above to the congregation of  Christians, Jesus states to the woman:  
"go and sin no  more" (John 8:11 KJV).   If, as Jesus states, the woman should go  and sin no more -- and in defiance, she continues to sin -- does that mean that  the Christian should ignore the commandment to have nothing to do with those who  reject the Gospel message, and choose to live a life of sin?   And how can the  Christian be at fault for discerning good and evil -- and fulfilling the  Commandment to be separate and not to touch those who choose to be unclean from  a Gospel perspective -- without possessing a very clear understanding of what  constitutes sin?   And refraining from such a lifestyle?   Perhaps more  important is Jesus' words to the man he healed: 
 "Behold, thou art made  whole: sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto  thee" (John 5:14 KJV) -- an ignored profound  statement which is explored in the article: 
Obama  - The Church's New Simon Magus?   If as Jesus states that a  person's actions can bring even worse circumstances upon them, then the whole  concept of Obamacare which attempts to ignore the cause of each person's plight,  should be rejected by every believer today.
   
 As a biblical author, Paul is the most misunderstood -- prompting Peter to  write with respect to the Epistles of Paul that 
"...as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things,  in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people  twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the  Scriptures" (2 Pet 3:13-18  NKJ).   The key is seen here in the fact that people were misinterpreting  Paul's doctrine of 
faith apart from actions, and  thereby twisting this doctrine 
"...to their own  destruction".   And to the degree that people were  twisting Paul's doctrine of faith, is in fact the legacy of Martin Luther as  demonstrated conclusively in this link in the article 
The Lie (see 
The Legacy Of Martin  Luther).    Perhaps just as important is the fact that Peter is warning that  
ignorance is not bliss -- and those who twist Paul's doctrine  of faith into a doctrine of apathetic complacency, were in fact  orchestrating 
"...their own  destruction".  Yet, Paul's warning has no place in modern  non-discerning Church dogma that preaches salvation regardless of one's actions  and lifestyle. 
   
 As Church leaders, the signers of 
The Manhattan Declaration may  very well have waited too long to lead the people in The Way of Righteousness  that is clearly required of those who call themselves Christians.     Most  often, while the secular progressives define morality to accommodate their most  base appetites of the carnal instincts of the flesh -- and in the same way  that for the sake of convenience they rip the unborn from the womb and call the  murder of the unborn choice -- daily, these same misguided souls immerse the  impressionable young minds of our children into a culture of spiritual  destruction.   But when we pose the question: 
Who is  responsible?   In failing to protect our children and teaching them to  discern good and evil, it is the sin of both Church leaders and the parents who  will be held accountable.   Thus the long ignored warning of Paul that 
"...For if we sin deliberately after  receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for  sins, but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume  the adversaries." (Heb 10:26-27 RSV).     And  it is for this reason that Paul stated that the Christian  should "...
not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is  sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or  an extortioner -- not even to eat with such a person" -- and a  Christian is obligated to
 "Come out from among them and be separate,  says the Lord."      
 The earth moves through phases -- and what is known as the Black Plague,  wiped out as much as 60% of the earth's population.   What is not realized is  the fact that the earth is moving through a similar phase in the present -- with  the exception being, that the disease is attacking the mind of those who live in  moral abandonment -- i.e., "...sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto  thee".   And while the multitude of people will dismiss the  very words and warning of Jesus, it is the failing of the Church to promote  proper discernment from a purely Gospel perspective, that is the true cause of  the problem.   Which causes us to pose the question: Is it too late for the  Manhattan Declaration to bring wholeness of mind to the mass of people who have  been stricken with the modern plague that is destroying our culture from  within?
  
 GodSpeed in TheWay,
  
 Jacob/James - Brother of Yeshua/Jesus